immagine

Attività svolta

Desidero ricevere una copia cartacea
Informativa sulla privacy
Iscrizione alla newsletter

We-Vet

Esame ecocardiografico ed eco-Doppler

Bibliografia

1.     Abbott J.A., MacLean H.N. Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of the feline left atrium. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2006; vol. 20: pp. 111–119.

2.     Bélanger M.C. Echocardiography. In: Ettinger S.J., Feldman E.C., Coté E. (Eds.): Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine – Disease of dog and cat. 8th Ed., Elsevier, St. Louis, 2017: pp. 393-410.

3.     Boon J.A. Veterinary echocardiography. 2nd Ed., Wiley-Blackwell, St. Louis, 2011.

4.     Boon J.A. Appendix two - Canine. In: Boon J.A. (Ed.): Veterinary echocardiography. 2nd Ed., Wiley-Blackwell, St. Louis, 2011: pp. 531-557.

5.     Boon J.A. Appendix four - Feline. In: Boon J.A. (Ed.): Veterinary echocardiography. 2nd Ed., Wiley-Blackwell, St. Louis, 2011: pp. 569-579.

6.     Brown D.J., Rush J.E., MacGregor J., et al. M-mode echocardiographic ratio indices in normal dogs, cats, and horse: a novel quantitative method. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2003; vol. 17: pp. 635-662.

7.     Bussadori C., Amberger C., Le Bobinnec G., Lombard C.W. Guidelines for the echocardiographic studies of suspected subaortic and pulmonic stenosis. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2000; vol. 2: pp. 15-22.

8.     Campbell F.E., Kittleson M.D. The effect of hydration status on the echocardiographic measurements of normal cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2007; vol. 21: pp. 1008-1015.

9.     Chetboul V., Tidholm A, Nicolle A., et al. Effects of animal position and number of repeated measurements on selected two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiographic variables in healthy dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2005; vol. 227: pp. 743-747.

10.  Cornell C.C., Kittleson M.D., Della Torre P., et al. Allometric scaling of M-mode cardiac measurements in normal adult dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2004; vol. 18: pp. 311–321.

11.  De Madron E., Chetboul V., Bussadori C. Clinical echocardiography of the dog and cat. Elsevier, St. Louis, 2016.

12.  Duler L., LeBlanc N.L., Cooley S., et al. Interreader agreement of radiographic left atrial enlargement in dogs and comparison to echocardiographic left atrial assessment. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2018; vol. 20: pp. 331-329.

13.  Fine D.M., Durham H.E., Rossi N.F., Spier A.W., et al. Echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic changes produced by two methods of inducing fluid deficit in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010; vol. 24: pp. 348-353.

14.  Gentile-Solomon J.M., Abbott J.A. Conventional echocardiographic assessment of the canine right heart: reference intervals and repeatability. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2016; vol. 18: pp. 234–247.

15.  Georgiev R., Rishniw M., Ljungvall I., Summerfield N. Common two-dimensional echocardiographic estimates of aortic linear dimensions are interchangeable. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2013; vol. 15: pp. 131–138.  

16.  Gomez A., Del Palacio J.F., Latorre R., et al. Plastinated heart slices aid echocardiographic interpretation in the dog. Vet. Radiol. & Ultrasound 2012; vol. 53: pp. 197-203.

17.  Häggstrom J., Luis Fuentes V., Wess G. Screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in cats. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2015; vol. 17: pp. S134–S149.  

18.  Häggstrom J., Andersson A.O., Falk T. et al. Effect of body weight on echocardiographic measurements in 19,866 pure-bred cats with or without heart disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2016; vol. 30: pp. 1601-1611.

19.  Hall D.J., Cornell C.C., Crawford S., Brown D.J. Meta-analysis of normal canine echocardiographic dimensional data using ratio indices. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2008; vol. 10: pp. 11-23.

20.  Hansson K., Haggstrom J., Kvart C. Lord P. Left atrial to aortic root indices using two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels with and without left atrial enlargement. Vet. Radiol. & Ultrasound 2002; vol. 43: pp.568-575. 

21.  Lang R.M., Badano L.P., Mor-Avi V., et al. Recommendations for cardiac chambers quantitation by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European ssociation of cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiography 2015; vol. 28: pp. 1–39.

22.  Rishniw M., Erb H.N. Evaluation of four 2-dimensional echocardiographic methods of assessing left atrial size in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2000; vol. 14: pp. 429-435.

23.  Sahn D.J., DeMaria A., Kisslo J.,  Weyman  A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; vol. 58: pp. 1072–1083.

24.  Schober K.E.Maerz I.Ludewig E., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiography and thoracic radiography in the assessment of left atrial size in cats: comparison with transthoracic 2dimensional echocardiographyJ. Vet. Intern. Med. 2007; vol. 21: pp. 709718.

25.  Serres F., Chetboul V., Tissier R., et al. Quantification of pulmonary to systemic flow

ratio by a Doppler echocardiographic method in the normal dog: Repeatability, reproducibility, and reference ranges. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2009; vol. 11: pp. 23-29.

26.  Thomas, W.P., Gaber, C.E., Jacobs G.J., et al. Recommendations for standards in transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in the dog and cat. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1993; vol. 7: pp. 247–252.

27.  Tidholm A., Westling A.B., Höglund K., et al. Comparison of 3-, 2-dimensional, and M-mode echocardiographic methods for estimation of left chamber volumes in dogs with and without acquired heart disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010; vol. 24: pp. 1414–1420.

28.  Wesselowski S., Borgarelli M., Bello N.M., Abbott J. Discrepancies in identification of left atrial enlargement using left atrial volume versus left atrial-to-aortic root ratio in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2014; vol. 28: pp. 1527-1533.

29.  Wilson H.E., Jasani S., Wagner T.B., et al. Signs of left heart volume overload in severely anaemic cats. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2010; vol. 12: pp. 904-909.

 

TORNA INDIETRO
Abbonati per accedere

Dal web internazionale
30/05/2019

Isolati microbici da corpi estranei vegetali inalati da cani

L'inalazione di spighe che migrano nel tratto respiratorio superiore e inferiore è un problema comune nei pazienti canini, in particolare durante i mesi estivi.. Queste spighe possono veicolare batteri e funghi, causando malattie da corpi estranei vegetali (grass seeds foreign body-related disease - GSFBD).

 
 
ERRATA CORRIGE

Nell’articolo dal titolo “Efficacia e sicurezza di un prodotto spot-on a base di imidacloprid e moxidectina nel trattamento della capillariosi nasale del cane”, pubblicato su Summa 10/2018 a pagina 44, la nota finale “Il presente articolo è stato pubblicato precedentemente su Veterinary Parasitology, 2017, vol. 116, Suppl 1, pp. 65-74”, è da modificarsi in “Il presente articolo è stato pubblicato precedentemente su Parasitology Research, 2017, vol. 116, Suppl 1, pp. 65-74”. Ce ne scusiamo con gli autori e i lettori. 

 

Formazione a distanza abbinata a SUMMA